Downloading torrents from coffee shops






















I love how they are providing an explanation for every single step. You'll get guided from the beginning to the end. Had some questions and their support service replied and helped in less than 24 hours. Kinda cool! Customer service was great and really no complaints. There are helpful tips provided on how to complete each section. The charts and visual sections of business plan are pretty cool addition.

Overall, it's a helpful resource to aid in completing a business plan. Create an account to write your business plans. Upmetrics is loved by beginners and experts, teams and individuals. Already have an account? Log In. Coffee Shop Business Plan Are you thinking of starting a coffee shop? View full outline Learn how to use this business plan? Use this Coffee Shop Business Plan as guide and start writing your business plan.

How you would you like to rate this template? Thank you! We have received your rating. Not found what you are looking for? Explore Business Plans. Assign torrent traffic to low priority, default everything else to medium to catch encrypted bittorrent , and give ports 80 and http and https high priority to keep web browsing customers happy. You need to be careful about giving ssh high priority because it's possible to run a tunnel over ssh and do your torrenting that way.

True, but it is just a tool that can be used irresponsibly, like any other. An interesting comparison would be bittorrent itself. Yes that would be an ideal solution, though it would require manufacturer intervention, which is unlikely at best. I certainly agree. The submitter mentions several technical solutions including QoS on his github page, and says they are better than using his "bithammer" tool. The advantage of his tool is that it does not require much involvement on the part of a non-technical propr.

As odd as this is going to sound, I disagree. A simple blanket statement that makes no allowance for corner cases? I'm going to need something more than that to be convinced. In this particular instance, the "wrong" of hogging bandwidth is far, far greater than the "wrong" of blasting the hogs into oblivion. Even though privately-owned and run, one should expect at least some sense of common courtesy when using a resource like wifi. There are very few legitimate reasons to run multi-GB BitTorrents at full-bore in a coffee shop, and I promise you that there are simply not that many people who desperately need an emergency.

Certainly, the guy could get a hotspot as suggested , but that's like telling the guy to go buy his own property if they want a quiet park to sit in when a small group in the public park has a constant loud party going on.

None of us want that. I like knowing that if my normal connectivity goes tits-up, I can duck into a coffee shop, buy a cup of joe, and use their wifi to do what needs done until I can get connected normally again. It's abusers of the system that eventually become the reason why we can't have nice things, so this little "wrong" is a pretty nice way to keep bigger "wrong"s to a minimum, no?

This, a thousand times owner. I rely on 'net connectivity for a living. If my internet drops, I'm packing my bags and going to one of my backup locations. One of those is a McDonalds, another is a local gas station that has wifi? The friends house is my first pick of course and usually the one I get.

But if I have to go to McDonalds or the gas station and somebody is making it impossible for me to make a living and feed my family because someone is torrenting, I will feel every bit justified in using bithammer.

You have every right to use a network as presented. If the network doesn't offer QoS take it up with the provider. You have no business banning others because you're oh so important. I see this during the weeks that there are festivals in Austin.

People camping tables at local cafes, not ordering anything, but using the wireless network for Netflix, with an occasional uTorrent downloading a movie to watch later on. One coffee shop here in Austin chucked their Wi-Fi because the tables kept occupied with people who didn't even at least buy a drink.

As soon as they stopped doing that, their business went up, since they had paying clients again. If I had a shop, I'd have a Wi-Fi system that would use one time passwords doesn't have to be extremely secure These would be free of charge with a purchase. This way, if someone wants to download a 22 gig BD-R rip, they can Elaborating on this, there could always be two tiers, one paid for with the one use password, and free It gets worse when you go RV-ing, to the point where a device with tethering or a personal Mi-Fi-like device is an absolute requirement.

There are just too many people who will clog up a RV park's Wi-Fi, making it unusable for everyone else. Plus, for decent Wi-fi, it is expensive Exactly right.

No one should have the right to beat up on a bully, and if they do, they should be punished greatly for it. Only the first bully is allowed to be a bully, and he shouldn't face any repercussions at all for his actions. But if anyone tries standing up to him because the authorities aren't bothering to do anything, or are actively encouraging him, those people should be brutally put down.

In one case a person can't access Internet as he wants as an unfortunate side effect of the others usage and bad network configuration.

In the other case the other person can't access Internet as he wants due to actively being suppressed by the first user. Yes, clearly the two wrong acts aren't equivalent. The torrent user is just an inconsiderate asshole while this dude is an outright malicious asshole. So it's one idiot ruining it for the entire cafe, vs one vigilante shutting him up. Yes it's a dirty trick, but it shouldn't be needed A very different view on it.

In fact a very good view to take on it. They are tad pricy but if access is that important It would basically be like going to a public park and deciding you do not want any dogs other people brought around and bringing along a paint ball gun to run them off. But your dog is OK. So I predict an escalation in the 'war'. Bittorrent apps detecting this behavior. Then showing macaddr and machine nam. That's an interesting level of hyperbole you have jumped to.

Torrent use can easily render a consumer-grade connection unusable. These torrent users on public wifi are at best irresponsible, and at worst malicious vandals.

The submitter's response to the problem is interesting, and while aggressive is certainly not violent as you've implied. You're using a free public network and selectively booting the users who don't fit into your specified profile. Why not just buy your own connection and stop being such a fucking Nazi?

If the torrent leeches don't care, why should he? And if you are neither him or a torrent leech, how is it your business to judge? Did you read the same synopsis I did? He is not talking about the owners, he is talking about other users coming in and grabbing all the bandwidth in public hotspots. I can see owners wanting to run this, it would have to run under Windows though. If a bittorrent user suddenly opens up a few thousand additional connections regardless of actual bandwidth then that ends up knocking everyone else off that firewall.

The bittorrent users could prevent the problem by limiting how many connections are allowed per torrent, but it sounds like they're not doing that. Rather than forcing bittorrent users off the network entirely, it would be better if the access point itself limited the number of connections per MAC address to something reasonable.

This would prevent the symptom from occurring. The issue is that this guy is using a security weakness in a network protocol to redirect the traffic of users he doesn't like to himself. I'm sure you've heard the idea that the ends don't justify the means? Should hotels, coffee shops and other "public" wifi providers use better APs?

Should APs in general be made better? Should bittorrent users be more considerate? Is this guy an asshole committing crimes on other people's networks in his own self-interest? They are not "using some of the bandwidth". They are DOSsing the router by filling its connection table. Quite different. This basically boils down to: "My use is more important than your use, under a flimsy excuse that your use could potentially interfere with my use, I will deliberately abuse the network in order to wilfully interfere with your use.

The router knows the addresses of users connected over WiFi, and it's extremely unlikely those WiFi users will be routes for other devices. This seems like a good measure in general to make MITM harder. It shouldn't take long to poison the whole access point.

If you run a packet generator it should take a few seconds. Please leave Slashdot. They lie right to your face about it? Wait a minute.

Who the hell are you anyway and what do you have to say about it? If it bothers you, buy yourself a mobile hotspot and STFU. What's the next complaint? That their conversations are too loud and you can't hear your conference calls? Bittorrent users are effectively performing a denial of service attack on an entire network that doesn't belong to them.

Please explain how running a script like this, with the owners permission, makes the script-writer worse than the torrenters? The torrenters do not have a god given right to abuse someone else's network. Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass.

User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. This coffee joint will provide a place to sit, enjoy coffee, share notes and think about the future. Advertisement All the business related to food and drinks are approved by the XYZ department therefore, I am attaching a business proposal of my idea along with this letter.

Kindly consider my request. Eagerly waiting for your response. Regards, [Your Name] Department of Food and Authority Introduction Coffee shops are places that primarily serve coffee and other snack items to their customers. Coffee shops or cafes have gained much popularity as compared to fine restaurants because of the comfortable environment provided by a coffee shop. Moreover, these coffee places are highly popular among students of different age groups and they get together at such places for sharing their homework or talking about sports.

Students from different institutes find coffee joints as a place to meet each other and spend some quality time. These coffee shops are also preferred by people who want to read, write, or think peacefully without any interruption and enjoy themselves. Different types of coffees are served at a coffee joint along with snacks and quick bites as people are always in a hurry. They also provide coffee to go in disposable cups for students and people who are in a hurry and cannot sit and enjoy.

These joints never go out of business due to their easy and friendly environment, a wide range of menu that is liked by everyone and is easy on the pocket. Many coffee joints also showcase books from local authors to promote reading in students as well as for the publicity of the author. Such small gestures make these places memorable.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000